Ticketing alone can't deliver the visibility that fund administrators need (2026)
Ticketing systems handle individual requests well enough. A client emails about a compliance filing, you create a ticket, and someone resolves it. Job done.
But that ticket doesn't show all the roadblocks your team runs into along the way, like the approval chain that stalled because someone's on holiday or the handoff to the compliance team that never quite happened.
And when you can't see how the work actually gets done, those blind spots compound fast – especially when you're delivering outsourced fund administration to multiple clients, each with different SLA requirements and processes.
Why visibility matters for fund administrators
Ticketing systems track requests, but they can't show you how the work actually gets done. Part of the problem stems from how fund administrators struggle with integration across their tech stack – ticketing systems simply weren't built to connect everything. And that creates problems that hit fund managers every day.
You can't see which client portfolios are approaching their SLA deadlines unless someone goes and checks – or spot bottlenecks until they've already caused delays. And when a client asks for a status update on their investor report, your team is left trying to piece together information from tickets, emails, and three different platforms.
Without workflow visibility, you're also missing opportunities to improve. Which clients have similar regulatory requirements where you could standardise processes? Where are teams duplicating work that could be shared across portfolios? Which bottlenecks, if fixed, would improve service delivery for your entire client base?
Your ticketing system wasn't built to answer such complicated questions.
Plus, you end up having to manage spreadsheets alongside your ticketing systems to create the visibility the tickets don't provide. Which means the same information gets entered twice, turning version control into a nightmare.
How scaling amplifies the visibility problem
Scaling up should make operations more efficient. Instead, every new client makes it harder to see what's actually happening.
Each new client brings their own SLA requirements, but most ticketing systems treat every ticket the same. So someone has to manually track which deadline applies to which deliverable.
Each client also has their own workflow requirements that tickets alone can't account for. Some need dual approval on compliance filings, others need to meet the (AIFM) Directive. Tickets capture the request, but they don't account for these SLA requirements.
Then there's resource allocation. Your operations managers need visibility into the whole team’s capacity when month-end processing rolls around. Ticketing systems show you how many tasks need doing, but they don't show which are going to take the most time, which tasks can overlap, and where bottlenecks are forming.
What process orchestration offers fund administrators
A 2025 survey of accountants, bookkeepers, and tax pros revealed that firms that applied workflow automation reported faster task completion (22.3%), improved team visibility (11%), and better deadline performance (9.1%) – outcomes ticketing systems alone can’t provide.
That’s the difference process orchestration can make in your business. Its automations sit above your existing systems to give you a complete bird’s eye view of your overall workflows and datapoints – as well as per-client workflow visibility that ticketing systems alone simply can’t offer.
Instead of just tracking that a compliance filing request exists, orchestration shows the entire workflow. Every step is visible, every handoff is tracked, and every SLA is monitored against client-specific requirements.
That visibility extends across your entire operation. Operations managers can see exactly what's happening for each client portfolio in real time. Plus, they can spot patterns across clients that reveal standardisation opportunities and process improvements.
The difference between ticketing and orchestration is the difference between knowing a request exists and seeing all the work needed to deliver it – and where it’s going to hit a bottleneck if you don’t rework your team’s schedule.
How Enate delivers visibility at scale
Enate orchestrates every workflow that impacts service delivery across your client portfolios, connecting the systems, processes, and handoffs that ticketing alone can't track.
Real-time workflow visibility shows exactly where work stands for each client, from capital calls to compliance filings to onboarding workflows. Every process is visible at every stage, with client-specific SLA tracking that accounts for different requirements across your portfolio. That frees operations managers from constantly chasing status updates so they can focus on delivery instead.
Intelligent workflow routing puts work in front of the right teams based on client requirements, current workload, and available capacity. When you hit month-end, Enate optimises resource allocation automatically. Which means you can double your client base without your operations becoming twice as complex and time-consuming.
Enate's analytics also reveal patterns across your client base that individual tickets would never show. Which processes consistently deliver ahead of schedule? Which regularly create bottlenecks? Which client-specific requirements could be standardised to improve efficiency across portfolios? Armed with this data, you can make strategic improvements that benefit your entire operation.
By orchestrating every workflow that impacts service delivery, Enate transforms fund administration from reactive ticket tracking to getting ahead of problems. That means fewer missed SLAs, better resource use, and the visibility to scale efficiently as your client base grows.
If you're still managing client portfolios with ticketing systems and spreadsheets, it's time to see what workflow orchestration can do.
Book a demo to see how Enate connects your workflows and gives you the visibility ticketing alone can't provide.
‍
